Home
World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews
International Journal with High Impact Factor for fast publication of Research and Review articles

Main navigation

  • Home
    • Journal Information
    • Abstracting and Indexing
    • Editorial Board Members
    • Reviewer Panel
    • Journal Policies
    • WJARR CrossMark Policy
    • Publication Ethics
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Article processing fee
    • Track Manuscript Status
    • Get Publication Certificate
    • Current Issue
    • Issue in Progress
    • Past Issues
    • Become a Reviewer panel member
    • Join as Editorial Board Member
  • Contact us
  • Downloads

eISSN: 2581-9615 || CODEN (USA): WJARAI || Impact Factor: 8.2 || ISSN Approved Journal

Comparison of antibacterial activities of lime (Citrus aurantifolia) and lemon (Citrus limon) juices on Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Escherichia coli

Breadcrumb

  • Home
  • Comparison of antibacterial activities of lime (Citrus aurantifolia) and lemon (Citrus limon) juices on Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Escherichia coli

Alisa Amalia Febriyana 1, Nurul Wiqoyah 2, * and Nurina Hasanatuludhhiyah 3 

1 Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia.

2 Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia.

3 Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia.

Research Article

World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 2026, 29(01), 1809-1817

Article DOI: 10.30574/wjarr.2026.29.1.0250

DOI url: https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2026.29.1.0250

Received on 22 December 2025; revised on 28 January 2026; accepted on 30 January 2026

Lime (Citrus aurantifolia) and lemon (Citrus limon) juices have the potential to be used as natural alternative therapies for infections caused by Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Escherichia coli. The aim of this research was to compare antibacterial activities between lime (Citrus aurantifolia) and lemon (Citrus limon) juices against Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Escherichia coli bacteria. This was a laboratory experimental study. In vitro testing was carried out using the diffusion method.  Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Escherichia coli were cultured on Mueller Hinton Agar (MHA) media. The diameter of the inhibition zones produced on the culture media after being treated with multiple concentrations of lime (Citrus aurantifolia) and lemon (Citrus limon) juices were measured. All concentrations of lime juice and lemon juice (25%, 50%, 75%, and 100%) produced the diameter of the inhibition zones in the culture media of the three bacteria, with the greatest diameter seen at the concentration of 100%. Lime juice and lemon juice affects the diameter of the three bacteria's inhibition zones, and there is a significant difference between the two, especially at a concentration of 100% on the growth of Escherichia coli. Against Staphylococcus aureus, lime juice has an antibacterial effectiveness range of 23-12mm. Meanwhile, lemon juice has a range of 21-12 mm for the same bacteria and concentration. For Pseudomonas aeruginosa, the antibacterial effectiveness range of lime juice is 21-13 mm and lemon juice is 20-11 mm. Lime juice and lemon juice have antibacterial effectiveness ranges of 18-10 mm and 16-9 mm respectively against Escherichia coli. The antibacterial effectiveness value of lime juice against the three bacteria tested was always slightly higher than lemon juice.

Antibacterial; Lime (Citrus aurantifolia); Lemon (Citrus limon); Juice

https://journalwjarr.com/sites/default/files/fulltext_pdf/WJARR-2026-0250.pdf

Get Your e Certificate of Publication using below link

Download Certificate

Preview Article PDF

Alisa Amalia Febriyana, Nurul Wiqoyah and Nurina Hasanatuludhhiyah. Comparison of antibacterial activities of lime (Citrus aurantifolia) and lemon (Citrus limon) juices on Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Escherichia coli. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 2026, 29(01), 1809-1817. Article DOI: https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2026.29.1.0250.

Copyright © 2026 Author(s) retain the copyright of this article. This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Liscense 4.0

Footer menu

  • Contact

Copyright © 2026 World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews - All rights reserved

Developed & Designed by VS Infosolution