Home
World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews
International Journal with High Impact Factor for fast publication of Research and Review articles

Main navigation

  • Home
    • Journal Information
    • Abstracting and Indexing
    • Editorial Board Members
    • Reviewer Panel
    • Journal Policies
    • WJARR CrossMark Policy
    • Publication Ethics
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Article processing fee
    • Track Manuscript Status
    • Get Publication Certificate
    • Current Issue
    • Issue in Progress
    • Past Issues
    • Become a Reviewer panel member
    • Join as Editorial Board Member
  • Contact us
  • Downloads

eISSN: 2581-9615 || CODEN (USA): WJARAI || Impact Factor: 8.2 || ISSN Approved Journal

Performance evaluation of atmospheric water generators under suboptimal humidity conditions in Orangeburg, SC

Breadcrumb

  • Home

Nasrollah Hamidi *, Patience Ferguson, Alicia Dankwa and Hadyn Hines 

Department of Biological and Physical Sciences, 1890-Research, South Carolina State University, Orangeburg, SC 29117, USA.

Research Article

World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 2025, 25(01), 1048-1057

Article DOI: 10.30574/wjarr.2025.25.1.0154

DOI url: https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2025.25.1.0154

Received on 30 November 2024; revised on 12 January 2025; accepted on 14 January 2025

Two commercial atmospheric water generators (AWGs) were studied to compare their performance under varying environmental conditions. The efficiency of water harvesting depends on factors such as the instrument’s design, power consumption, ambient temperature, and relative humidity (RH). AWGs operate optimally at humidity levels above 80% at room temperatures but also serve as efficient dehumidifiers in high-humidity regions. To ensure high-quality drinking water, AWGs use food-grade materials for condenser coatings and employ advanced filtration systems, including reverse osmosis and UV sterilization. This study presents the water harvesting performance of these devices during the summer in Orangeburg, SC, where the average laboratory temperature ranged from 25–29 °C, and RH was between 59–69%. Results highlight the potential and limitations of AWGs in moderate-humidity environments. Under these conditions, the AWG1, harvested 1.56 mLW⁻¹, which means $0.077 per liter of water at the electricity rate of $0.12kW⁻¹. The AWG2 harvested 0.42 mLW⁻¹, or $0.29 per liter of water at the same electricity rate.

Water scarcity mitigation; Renewable water resources; Water yield comparison; Energy efficiency in AWGs; Water collection rates; Condensation-based AWGs; Atmospheric water generators (AWGs); Water harvesting technologies

https://journalwjarr.com/sites/default/files/fulltext_pdf/WJARR-2025-0154.pdf

Preview Article PDF

Nasrollah Hamidi, Patience Ferguson, Alicia Dankwa and Hadyn Hines. Performance evaluation of atmospheric water generators under suboptimal humidity conditions in Orangeburg, SC. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 2025, 25(01), 1048-1057. Article DOI: https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2025.25.1.0154.

Copyright © 2025 Author(s) retain the copyright of this article. This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Liscense 4.0

Footer menu

  • Contact

Copyright © 2026 World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews - All rights reserved

Developed & Designed by VS Infosolution