1 University of Abuja.,
2 University of Liverpool.,
3 Institute of Governance and Development Studies, Nasarawa State University Keffi.
4 APUDI Institute for Peace Studies and Social Rehabilitation.
World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 2025, 28(03), 2226-2236
Article DOI: 10.30574/wjarr.2025.28.3.4321
Received on 23 November 2025; revised on 28 December 2025; accepted on 31 December 2025
The enactment of Nigeria’s Electricity Act 2023 represents a paradigm shift from a centralized to a decentralized model of electricity governance, aiming to empower States and catalyse investment. However, this legislative ambition has been critically tested in practice. This study employs a qualitative, desktop research methodology to conduct a critical policy analysis, assessing the regulatory gaps within the Electricity Act 2023 through the empirical lens of the Imo State electricity crisis. Guided by Institutional Theory, the research investigates how ambiguities in the Act have fostered regulatory conflict and how the absence of clear investor-entry frameworks has precipitated infrastructure disputes. Thematic and content analysis of primary legal documents, official regulatory reports, and verified media documentation reveals that the Act contains significant institutional voids. Specifically, the findings indicate that the lack of clearly delineated jurisdictional boundaries between federal and state regulators created a fertile ground for overlapping mandates and institutional rivalry between the Nigerian Electricity Regulatory Commission (NERC) and the Imo State Electricity Regulatory Commission (ISERC). Furthermore, the study establishes that the Act’s failure to provide structured guidelines on market entry sequencing, asset transfer, and pre-construction certification directly contributed to chaotic investment, confrontational infrastructure development, and the coercive seizure of assets. The study concludes that the Imo State crisis is a direct manifestation of these legislative deficiencies, demonstrating that decentralization without meticulous legal precision can exacerbate, rather than resolve, sectoral conflicts. The study therefore recommends targeted amendments to the Electricity Act 2023 to clarify jurisdictional boundaries and the issuance of a comprehensive regulatory order to establish a transparent and conflict-sensitive investor-entry framework, which are essential preconditions for achieving the Act’s stated goals of a stable, competitive, and investment-driven electricity market in Nigeria.
Electricity Act 2023; Regulatory Gaps; Imo State Electricity Crisis; Institutional Theory; Investor-Entry Framework
Get Your e Certificate of Publication using below link
Preview Article PDF
OBASA Ayodele Babajide, ADESUYI Olutayo Muyiwa, VINCI Fadeyi Oyetunji, ZAMANI Andrew, ONIBIYO Ezekiel Rotimi. Assessing the regulatory gaps in the Electricity Act 2023 through the Imo State electricity crisis. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 2025, 28(03), 2226-2236. Article DOI: https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2025.28.3.4321
Copyright © 2025 Author(s) retain the copyright of this article. This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Liscense 4.0