1 Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia.
2 Department of Dermatology Venereology and Aesthetic, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia.
World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 2025, 28(02), 1824-1826
Article DOI: 10.30574/wjarr.2025.28.2.3862
Received on 10 October 2025; revised on 19 November 2025; accepted on 21 November 2025
Background: Syphilis is a sexually transmitted infection caused by Treponema pallidum, with more than seven million new cases annually worldwide. The standard therapy remains Benzathine penicillin G, but issues such as allergy, limited availability, and emerging antibiotic resistance necessitate an evaluation of non-penicillin alternatives.
Objective: This review aims to assess the effectiveness of penicillin and non-penicillin alternatives in the treatment of syphilis based on recent literature.
Methods: Articles were retrieved from PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar using the keywords “syphilis,” “penicillin,” “doxycycline,” “ceftriaxone,” and “azithromycin.” Publications from 2015 to 2024 were included if they discussed clinical outcomes of penicillin or non-penicillin therapy for syphilis.
Results: Penicillin remains the most effective therapy for all stages of syphilis, achieving cure rates above 95%. Doxycycline shows 85–90% efficacy, while ceftriaxone achieves 90–92% but requires parenteral administration. Azithromycin presents lower efficacy (70–80%) and higher resistance rates.
Conclusion: Benzathine penicillin G remains the gold standard for syphilis treatment. Doxycycline and ceftriaxone are effective alternatives for patients allergic to penicillin, whereas azithromycin is not recommended due to resistance concerns.
Syphilis; Penicillin; Doxycycline; Ceftriaxone; Antibiotic Resistance
Get Your e Certificate of Publication using below link
Preview Article PDF
Kenny Vincentius Purnama and Dwi Murtiastutik. The effectiveness of penicillin and non-penicillin alternatives in the treatment of syphilis: A literature review. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 2025, 28(02), 1824-1826. Article DOI: https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2025.28.2.3862.
Copyright © 2025 Author(s) retain the copyright of this article. This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Liscense 4.0