Home
World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews
International Journal with High Impact Factor for fast publication of Research and Review articles

Main navigation

  • Home
    • Journal Information
    • Abstracting and Indexing
    • Editorial Board Members
    • Reviewer Panel
    • Journal Policies
    • WJARR CrossMark Policy
    • Publication Ethics
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Article processing fee
    • Track Manuscript Status
    • Get Publication Certificate
    • Current Issue
    • Issue in Progress
    • Past Issues
    • Become a Reviewer panel member
    • Join as Editorial Board Member
  • Contact us
  • Downloads

eISSN: 2581-9615 || CODEN (USA): WJARAI || Impact Factor: 8.2 || ISSN Approved Journal

Diesel or Jatropha Biodiesel? A life cycle assessment approach for sustainable energy decisions

Breadcrumb

  • Home

Jorge Nhambiu 1, *, José Gui Naldo Muchanga 1 and Fernando Chichango 2

1 Mechanical Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Eduardo Mondlane University, Maputo, Mozambique.

2 ECROT Department, Faculty of Environmental and Natural Resource Engineering, Zambeze University, Chimoio, Mozambique.

Research Article

World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 2025, 28(02), 1416–1426

Article DOI: 10.30574/wjarr.2025.28.2.3875

DOI url: https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2025.28.2.3875

Received 08 October 2025; revised on 15 November 2025; accepted on 17 November 2025

This study compares the environmental and economic performance of diesel and Jatropha biodiesel using Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) and cost analysis for a functional unit of 1,000 km traveled. Results indicate that Jatropha biodiesel reduces overall environmental impact by approximately 37%, primarily due to net negative CO₂ emissions from carbon sequestration during cultivation, and offers significant improvements in global warming potential, fossil fuel depletion, and particulate matter formation. However, biodiesel requires 111.1 liters versus 100 liters of diesel for the same distance, reflecting its lower energy density (37 MJ/L vs. 43 MJ/L), and incurs a 42.7% higher cost per unit of useful energy (USD 0.157/MJ vs. USD 0.09/MJ), raising the total cost for 1,000 km from USD 136 to USD 225.53. Qualitatively, Jatropha biodiesel emerges as a cleaner alternative with strong climate benefits, but its competitiveness is constrained by higher production costs, land use, and water consumption. These findings highlight the need for technological improvements and policy support to enhance the economic viability of biodiesel while leveraging its environmental advantages.

Life Cycle Assessment; Jatropha Biodiesel; Environmental Impact; Renewable Energy; Sustainable Fuel Alternatives

https://journalwjarr.com/sites/default/files/fulltext_pdf/WJARR-2025-3875.pdf

Preview Article PDF

Jorge Nhambiu, José Gui Naldo Muchanga and Fernando Chichango. Diesel or Jatropha Biodiesel? A life cycle assessment approach for sustainable energy decisions. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 2025, 28(02), 1416–1426. Article DOI: https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2025.28.2.3875.

Copyright © 2025 Author(s) retain the copyright of this article. This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Liscense 4.0

Footer menu

  • Contact

Copyright © 2026 World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews - All rights reserved

Developed & Designed by VS Infosolution