1 Cardiac Surgery Intensive Care Unit, Faculty of Health Sciences University General Hospital of Alexandroupolis, Alexandroupolis, Greece.
2 Department of Nursing, Democritus University of Thrace, Alexandroupolis, Greece.
World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 2025, 28(01), 812-818
Article DOI: 10.30574/wjarr.2025.28.1.3287
Received on 20 August 2025; revised on 25 September 2025; accepted on 29 September 2025
Introduction: Patients who undergo cardiac surgery stay in intensive care for the first hours or days after their operation and experience severe pain. Several pain assessment tools have been used in cardiac surgery patients, although none is especially designed for this subpopulation of patients.
Purpose: This narrative review explores the existing observational and behavioral tools for assessment of pain in adult cardio surgical patients
Methods: A literature review was conducted using the international databases Medline/PubMed, Scopus and Google Scholar. Only quantitative studies published in English language journals were included.
Results: The following pain assessment tools have been used in cardiac surgery patients in ICU: The Behavioral Pain Scale (BPS),Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool (CPOT),Non-Verbal Pain Scale (NVPS), Non-Verbal Pain Assessment Tool (NPAT), Faces, Legs, Activity, Cry and Consolability Scale (FLACC), Visual Analogue Scales (VAS), Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), as well as Verbal Descriptor Scale and its alternative, the Thermometer Pain Scale (TPS).
Conclusions: There is a scarcity of data on pain assessment of cardiac surgery patients in ICU. The existing pain assessment tools have considerable limitations. The creation of a new tool especially designed for cardiac surgery patients is strongly suggested.
Pain; Assessment Tools; Cardiac Surgery Patients; Intensive Care Unit; Adults
Preview Article PDF
Foteini Karakasidou, Dimitrios Kosmidis and Vasileios Vosnidis. Pain assessment tools in cardiac surgery patients, challenges and perspectives: A review article. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 2025, 28(01), 812-818. Article DOI: https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2025.28.1.3287.
Copyright © 2025 Author(s) retain the copyright of this article. This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Liscense 4.0