Home
World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews
International Journal with High Impact Factor for fast publication of Research and Review articles

Main navigation

  • Home
    • Journal Information
    • Abstracting and Indexing
    • Editorial Board Members
    • Reviewer Panel
    • Journal Policies
    • WJARR CrossMark Policy
    • Publication Ethics
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Article processing fee
    • Track Manuscript Status
    • Get Publication Certificate
    • Current Issue
    • Issue in Progress
    • Past Issues
    • Become a Reviewer panel member
    • Join as Editorial Board Member
  • Contact us
  • Downloads

eISSN: 2581-9615 || CODEN (USA): WJARAI || Impact Factor: 8.2 || ISSN Approved Journal

The effectiveness of penicillin and non-penicillin alternatives in the treatment of syphilis: A literature review

Breadcrumb

  • Home
  • The effectiveness of penicillin and non-penicillin alternatives in the treatment of syphilis: A literature review

Kenny Vincentius Purnama 1 and Dwi Murtiastutik 2, *

1 Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia.

2 Department of Dermatology Venereology and Aesthetic, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia.

Review Article

World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 2025, 28(02), 1824-1826

Article DOI: 10.30574/wjarr.2025.28.2.3862

DOI url: https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2025.28.2.3862

Received on 10 October 2025; revised on 19 November 2025; accepted on 21 November 2025

Background: Syphilis is a sexually transmitted infection caused by Treponema pallidum, with more than seven million new cases annually worldwide. The standard therapy remains Benzathine penicillin G, but issues such as allergy, limited availability, and emerging antibiotic resistance necessitate an evaluation of non-penicillin alternatives.

Objective: This review aims to assess the effectiveness of penicillin and non-penicillin alternatives in the treatment of syphilis based on recent literature.

Methods: Articles were retrieved from PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar using the keywords “syphilis,” “penicillin,” “doxycycline,” “ceftriaxone,” and “azithromycin.” Publications from 2015 to 2024 were included if they discussed clinical outcomes of penicillin or non-penicillin therapy for syphilis.

Results: Penicillin remains the most effective therapy for all stages of syphilis, achieving cure rates above 95%. Doxycycline shows 85–90% efficacy, while ceftriaxone achieves 90–92% but requires parenteral administration. Azithromycin presents lower efficacy (70–80%) and higher resistance rates.

Conclusion: Benzathine penicillin G remains the gold standard for syphilis treatment. Doxycycline and ceftriaxone are effective alternatives for patients allergic to penicillin, whereas azithromycin is not recommended due to resistance concerns.

Syphilis; Penicillin; Doxycycline; Ceftriaxone; Antibiotic Resistance

https://journalwjarr.com/sites/default/files/fulltext_pdf/WJARR-2025-3862.pdf

Get Your e Certificate of Publication using below link

Download Certificate

Preview Article PDF

Kenny Vincentius Purnama and Dwi Murtiastutik. The effectiveness of penicillin and non-penicillin alternatives in the treatment of syphilis: A literature review. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 2025, 28(02), 1824-1826. Article DOI: https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2025.28.2.3862.

Copyright © 2025 Author(s) retain the copyright of this article. This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Liscense 4.0

Footer menu

  • Contact

Copyright © 2026 World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews - All rights reserved

Developed & Designed by VS Infosolution