Psychology Group, Regent’s University London, Inner Circle, Regent’s Park, London NW1 4NS United Kingdom.
World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 2025, 25(03), 368-375
Article DOI: 10.30574/wjarr.2025.25.3.0720
Received on 26 January 2025; revised on 03 March 2025; accepted on 05 March 2025
The present study explored perceptions towards the use of psychedelics. Existing literature suggests that psychedelics can be an effective alternative in the treatment of mental health conditions. However, negative perceptions are commonly expressed in online communities about the use of psychedelics in the mental health context. This controversy in perceptions and societal beliefs surrounding psychedelic use was empirically explored through the collection of in-depth, qualitative data gathered from individuals who had no contact with psychedelics. Eight participants were recruited using snowball and convenience sampling methods and were interviewed online regarding their perceptions and beliefs on this topic. Four distinct themes emerged from a thematic analysis of the dataset: Imbalance within Control Dynamics, Therapeutic Efficacy, Across Generations and Borders, and Growing Awareness. Participants’ narratives suggest that age and culture are important factors influencing individuals’ perceptions towards the use of psychedelics. While the potential benefits of using psychedelics in mental health treatment is acknowledged, participants’ accounts highlight their apprehensions regarding the application of psychedelics in controlled and safe settings. The present findings improve our understanding of perceptions and beliefs surrounding the use of psychedelics and influence a positive shift in societal beliefs and perceptions.
Psychedelics; Perceptions; Beliefs; Qualitative; Thematic Analysis
Preview Article PDF
Kerem Kemal Soylemez, Emma Marie de Boo, Coral Yaron Shoklander, Oliver Edward Lawrence and Joanne Lusher. From controversy to curiosity: A qualitative exploration of societal perceptions of psychedelics. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 2025, 25(03), 368-375. Article DOI: https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2025.25.3.0720.
Copyright © 2025 Author(s) retain the copyright of this article. This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Liscense 4.0