Home
World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews
International Journal with High Impact Factor for fast publication of Research and Review articles

Main navigation

  • Home
    • Journal Information
    • Abstracting and Indexing
    • Editorial Board Members
    • Reviewer Panel
    • Journal Policies
    • WJARR CrossMark Policy
    • Publication Ethics
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Article processing fee
    • Track Manuscript Status
    • Get Publication Certificate
    • Current Issue
    • Issue in Progress
    • Past Issues
    • Become a Reviewer panel member
    • Join as Editorial Board Member
  • Contact us
  • Downloads

eISSN: 2581-9615 || CODEN (USA): WJARAI || Impact Factor: 8.2 || ISSN Approved Journal

Comparative Assessment of Levodopa and Carbidopa Cleanability from Stainless Steel Surfaces: A Risk-Based Approach for Pharmaceutical Cleaning Validation

Breadcrumb

  • Home
  • Comparative Assessment of Levodopa and Carbidopa Cleanability from Stainless Steel Surfaces: A Risk-Based Approach for Pharmaceutical Cleaning Validation

Birju Patel 1, * and Jayminkumar Patel 2

1 Validation Engineering, Anika Therapeutics, Bedford, MA, USA.

2 Analytical R and D, Amneal Pharmaceuticals, Piscataway, NJ, USA.

Research Article

World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 2025, 28(01), 1960-1966

Article DOI: 10.30574/wjarr.2025.28.1.3653

DOI url: https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2025.28.1.3653

Received on 19 September 2025; revised on 25 October 2025; accepted on 27 October 2025

Background: Cleaning validation represents a critical component of pharmaceutical quality assurance, requiring scientific evidence that manufacturing equipment can be consistently cleaned to predetermined acceptance criteria. The selection of worst-case products for validation studies necessitates comparative cleanability assessments based on physicochemical properties and empirical data.

Objective: To systematically evaluate and compare the cleanability profiles of Levodopa and Carbidopa from stainless steel surfaces using multiple cleaning methodologies, establishing a scientifically justified worst-case product for cleaning validation protocols.

Methods: Stainless steel coupons (316L, 50×50mm) were contaminated with 1000 μg of each compound and subjected to three cleaning procedures: purified water submersion, 0.1N sodium hydroxide solution, and 1% detergent solution, each with 2-minute contact time. Residual contamination was quantified using validated HPLC-UV methodology with swab sampling. Statistical analysis included two-sample t-tests and effect size calculations (Cohen's d).

Results: Water cleaning demonstrated significant differences in removal efficiency between Levodopa (93.00±0.14%) and Carbidopa (86.05±0.21%; p=0.0012, Cohen's d=40.83). Alkaline cleaning improved both compounds' removal (Levodopa: 99.58±0.04%, Carbidopa: 98.25±0.07%; p=0.0018), while detergent achieved optimal cleaning (>99.6% for both). Carbidopa consistently exhibited lower cleanability across all methods, with residuals exceeding acceptance limits (10 μg/coupon) under water-only cleaning (138-141 μg/coupon).

Conclusions: Carbidopa represents the worst-case product for cleaning validation due to significantly lower removal efficiency, attributed to its reduced aqueous solubility (0.2 mg/mL versus 2.0 mg/mL for Levodopa). These findings support risk-based cleaning validation approaches and emphasize the necessity of alkaline or detergent-based cleaning for adequate contamination control in multi-product facilities.

Cleaning Validation; Levodopa; Carbidopa; Worst-Case Determination; Cleanability Comparison; HPLC Analysis; Risk Assessment

https://journalwjarr.com/sites/default/files/fulltext_pdf/WJARR-2025-3653.pdf

Preview Article PDF

Birju Patel and JayminkumarPatel. Comparative Assessment of Levodopa and Carbidopa Cleanability from Stainless Steel Surfaces: A Risk-Based Approach for Pharmaceutical Cleaning Validation. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 2025, 28(01), 1960-1966. Article DOI: https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2025.28.1.3653.

Copyright © 2025 Author(s) retain the copyright of this article. This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Liscense 4.0

Footer menu

  • Contact

Copyright © 2026 World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews - All rights reserved

Developed & Designed by VS Infosolution